0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
BACK TO CASE STUDIES
MAR 2, 2026

STYLEBOOK

From 'I hate this system' to 'Can we show other salons?'

ROLEProduct Designer
TIMELINE8 Months
IMPACT4.8★ Rating
STACKNext.js, Figma, Tailwind
StyleBook

Problem & Overview

From 'I hate this system' to 'Can we show other salons?' — StyleBook's salon management platform was technically functional but deeply frustrating for its users. Stylists had very strong opinions about their scheduling interface, and they were right.

The platform had grown feature-by-feature without a cohesive design vision. Appointment booking, inventory management, client records, and staff scheduling all felt like different products. Stylists were spending more time managing the software than managing their clients.

Process Image

Getting Started

We started by sitting in salons for three days, watching how stylists actually worked. The gap between the software's mental model and how salons operate was staggering. We mapped every workflow on physical whiteboards, then ruthlessly prioritized.

Process Image 2

What Actually Happened

Redesigned the core scheduling experience first — the highest-friction point. Then rebuilt inventory and client management to match how salon staff actually think about their day. Every screen was tested with real stylists before shipping.

What Changed

  • Saved stylists an average of 3 hours per week on administrative tasks
  • Client booking completion rate increased from 58% to 89%
  • Net Promoter Score went from -12 to +47 within 4 months of launch
  • Three competitor salons switched to StyleBook citing the new UX

What I Learned

Never assume you understand someone's workflow until you've watched them do it. Stylists work in a chaotic, social, fast-paced environment — our clean, linear software model was making their job harder, not easier. The best design decision was getting out of their way.